Turn off WiFi and Bluetooth unless you are actually using it. Thankfully, the solution to stop this tracking is simple. As long as the wifi adapter in your device (and the same principle applies to Bluetooth) is enabled, I can collect this data. If I see your MAC address anywhere else, I know exactly where you live - as well as the data about what you do while in my buildings.Īt this point, let me reiterate that you don't need to do anything to allow me to collect this data. I can drive past your house, listen for any probe requests and log those. For me (or any scary three letter organisations), this information is pure gold.įrom an intelligence perspective, once I put a name to a MAC address, I can cross reference logs from many places and track you in any places that I can listen - and you will never know. I can likely tell if you drove to my building - or took the bus. I can tell how fast you walked from one end to the other. I can tell how long you spend in my building - and where you enter and leave. As I can get an indication of what range I can receive your device from - I can log your probe requests - and timestamp them - as you pass between my access points.īig deal right? Well - basic analysis of this kind of data from a shopping centre can tell me what shops you visit or what areas you like to spend time in. However - what happens now if I have a large building (like an airport or shopping centre)? I can scatter these receivers on different channels throughout the building. When you move out of range, I'll stop getting your probe requests and it can be safe to assume you have left the area. If I set up a device to purely sit silent and listen for these probe requests, then write the MAC address and timestamp to a file - then I can tell when you pass within range of my access point - for as long as you are in the area. I'm interested in seeing where you are going - not what access points are available. However, what if we turn the tables a little? The power requirements are much lower - after the initial probe request, the adapter only listens for a fraction of time compared to a passive scan (although this varies per manufacturer and driver). This is where things get interesting.Īctive Scanning is the default in just about every device existing. well, lets say I'd win at the lotto every week before that would happen in the wild. The chances of getting two MAC addresses of the same value are. Now - your MAC Address is considered globally unique. In this process, the wifi card transmits a probe request on the currently tuned channel. So we have implementation #2 - mostly referred to as Active Scanning. Sure, you can only run a scan lets say, every 30 seconds - but that still means you have the receiver powered up for 5 seconds out of every minute. We have 12 (or 14 in some areas) channels in the 2.4Ghz band, so a full scan would take 102,400μs x 2 x 12 = 2,457,600μs or about 2.5 seconds.ĭuring this time, the receiver is in a high power usage mode - so battery life is negatively impacted and power usage for a wifi adapter sky-rockets. To have some hope of hearing most Access Points, you'll need to wait for 2 beacon intervals - say 102,400μs x 2 per channel. The beacon (by default) is only transmitted every 100 TU (102,400μs). The scan is completely passive and nothing is transmitted from your wifi adapter. There are two methods of scanning for active WiFi access points.ġ) Turn the receiver on and listen on each channel for the beacon orĢ) Broadcast a "Who is there?" packet on each channel. Wifi is an interesting protocol when you get into the gritty details.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |